Tag: donald-trump

  • The US midterms: Why are they important for the rest of the world?

    The US midterms: Why are they important for the rest of the world?

    Sometimes it can be hard to associate our own day-to-day lives with the weird and wild state of american politics. However it affects the UK more than it may initially appear. The choices and actions of the US have very real and serious consequences on Europe and the UK, and knowing what is going on across the pond is a useful step in staying up to date.

    So this tuesday last, the American public rolled up to polling station to have their say. Midterms in America are sort of a nationwide by-election mid way between a president’s term, i.e. a midterm. For 2026 all the 435 house seats were up for election and 35 out of the 100 senate seats. Whoever holds a majority in both has control on passing legislation or blocking opposition.

    This year was a very crucial midterm election as Trump is halfway through his second term and historically unpopular. The rising fuel costs due to the Iran war and the cost of living crisis put a shadow over Trump’s hopes to sweep the midterms. Both Trump and the republican party’s control of congress has led to these outcomes and thus put them in a sticky situation. Losing a midterm, although quite common for a majority party, reduces the absolute power of the president.

    The war especially has impacted the whole globe, leading to higher oil prices here in the UK as well as elsewhere. Alongside the military alliance with the US, the UK has been dragged into conflict in the Middle East. Its needless to say that the war is unpopular both here and in the US and therefore became a major factor at the midterms.

    With the stage set the election was under way. In the end the democrats came out on top. Quite a bit on top. They won 240 seats in the house, with a majority of 218 needed, and 54 seats in the senate out of 50 required. With a majority in both, Trump’s position is more untenable than ever.

    So what does this actually mean in real terms? Well the President is still in charge of the executive branch of government, so Trump has control of foreign affairs, particularly the war in Iran. However congress now a democratic stronghold, won’t be in support of the war. Infighting between the parties is highly expected and it will create a sort of roadblock for the next two years on how to continue foreign policy.

    Domestically Trump still retains his veto, which will most likely lead to a stalemate in congress, neither side able to pass any new domestic laws. However this also means Trump has been muzzled for the remainder of his term. Furthermore the democrats now have the power to investigate both the republicans and Trump for actions committed while in office. This is signposting a new era for Trump politics and will definitely change how he conducts the presidency.

    In conclusion, the US has reached a political stalemate, which globally is probably a beneficial thing. Trump now must be held accountable for his actions, which potentially may downgrade foreign conflicts. For the UK this is promising signs, both for the cost of living and the integrity of western democracy.

  • Performative Politics: Trump’s pageantry in office.

    Performative Politics: Trump’s pageantry in office.

    Yesterday the UFC held its 250th event at the white house, to commemorate 250 years since the founding of America, but also for Donald Trump’s birthday. It is not uncommon to see leaders of the world hold events in celebration of history and great achievements. However the celebration of one’s own birthday, partially funded by taxpayers money, is more akin to North Korea and Kim Jong Un .

    Trump is well known around the world as a divisive figure, constantly poking the boundaries of what he feasibly can get away with. However beyond the actual policies of his government, to which I shall not comment, there appears a peculiar case of pageantry. This is highlighted by the recent UFC event.

    By covering Trump for his recent term, many small factors have to come to light that appear closer to personal narcissism. The huge events, the parades, the statues, the name changes. They all are done with Trump’s image in mind. For him he wishes to represent himself as not just the president, but the best president to ever hold office.

    Although this is seperate from actual policy making, it does still hold infulence. Trump’s obsession with appearance bleeds into his decision making. Tariffs, international bullying and his attacking tweets. All of these are factors of strong manning, where an individual attempts to appear more masculine to force through ideas or plans.

    In many cases, alot of Trump’s policies rely on appearing successful rather than actually working. Short term success in all of his plans is key, which can be paraded around and weaponised against doubters. The Executive orders are the primary example. Signing his name on a piece of paper, as if that can instantly change the functionality of society. They appear as instant success and progress, yet the reality is very different.

    Many of his orders do not actually get implemented. They are either too ambitious, blocked by congress or just downright irresponsibly daft. Yet they appear to be instant and effective.

    Trump’s personality and ambition pools into a giant performance. Similiar to Stalin’s Gigantomania, and love all things superfluously large, Trump is all about the bigger, the better. As well all know, the bigger something appears, the weaker the foundations truly are.

    Therefore the UFC event, which has caused alot of outrage due to it’s public display of wealth and elitism, is but a symptom of a larger issue. Trump performs his position, and often tends to exaggerate many of his statements. Creating uncertainty around if he should be in the most powerful position in the world.